Board index Vancouver Forum


Vancouver forum is an open forum which daily sketches the diversity and the commonality of Vancouverites. It is also an online community where you can discover and discuss various aspects of life in Vancouver and the world at large. If you are a visitor or a soon-to-be resident of Vancouver, or simply have an interest in it, you are more than welcome to join the group of Vancouver Forum posters, but know that any questions you may have about the city and its neighborhoods, the quality of life and lifestyle, are likely going to be met with a barrage of insults by some our resident comedians.

If you are a Vancouverite who just stumbled upon these pages, you'd best get the hell out of here before anyone sees you, but if you do decide to join in, for God's sake don't tell them your ethnicity or you may never hear the end of it! Do not be surprised by uncensored and sometimes blatantly stupid, crazy, remarks that shouldn't ever be spoken in private, let alone on a public forum. If that still hasn't deterred you, then you probably have a thick enough skin and a good enough sense of humour to handle this place. Good luck. You're going to need it!


Register your free accountRead the forum rules

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 09:53

Quote Querky: "Males diddling boys is not a homosexual act. "

And in lalaland, the sun in the sky is not the sun??
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18203
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Advertisement

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby mimi » 25 Jun 2012, 09:55

Romero wrote:
cc la tarte wrote:I stated several times - "a homosexual act (males diddling boys) is a homosexual act" and asked your comment to it

I get the wiggle-around it reply, quote > "a pedophile who abuses boys, is not necessarily homosexual."

One more time, a simple straightforward question. - is males diddling boys (also males) a homosexual act"?
A simple "yes" or "no" would be great.

Wow. You are nasty.

A pedophile who abuses boys is not necessarily homosexual. Males diddling boys is not a homosexual act.

It's an act of pedophilia. Some people see the distinction....some don't.
mimi
 
Posts: 13591
Joined: 26 Aug 2011, 12:54

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 09:57

Right, an act of male / male rape i.e. an act of homosexual pedophilia

convenient "distinction", p a t h e t i c

I guess one has to live in lalaland to see the "distinction" with a straight ;) face ... unfucking real

HELP: I'm caught in mbland .. cc to earth .. cc to earth ...
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18203
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby mimi » 25 Jun 2012, 10:04

It's ok to admit you don't get it. It's not ok to try and convince those who do, that they don't.
mimi
 
Posts: 13591
Joined: 26 Aug 2011, 12:54

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 10:07

p a t h e t i c ... fucking p a t h e t i c .... only in mbworld

cc back to earth ... out
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18203
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby mimi » 25 Jun 2012, 10:11

cc la tarte wrote:p a t h e t i c ... fucking p a t h e t i c .... only in mbville ... cc back to earth ... out


Couldn't agree more.

Maybe while you're back on earth....you could read up on the subject....then there wouldn't be any need for argument.
mimi
 
Posts: 13591
Joined: 26 Aug 2011, 12:54

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 10:17

I have learned that in LaLaLand, young boy pedo victims can attempt to seek comfort in knowing that the homosexual act they were a victim of was not a really a homosexual act.

Moving on from LaLaLand, this may have gotten lost on another page
Gay Boy Bob wrote:In an earlier post you said 5-10% of the population is gay/lesbian. Make up your mind. It's bad enough you make up your 'facts'.
cc la tarte wrote: You are our resident gay ace. Despite all your many gay oriented posts, I don't recall seeing you put it all into perspective / numbers.

Put your money where your mouth is. Cite creditable stats. (Please try to avoid your left-loaded sources and cite something neutral and meaningful, maybe even official, eh? )

A straight ;) up Question to our resident Ex-Spurt > What %age of the overall male population is gay?

You are on: 1%? 3%? 6% .. another %? ...
Inquiring minds wonder. Please set us straight on "the facts"
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18203
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Gay Boy Bob » 25 Jun 2012, 10:29

Here are some FACTS for certain posters

Members of disliked minority groups are often stereotyped as representing a danger to the majority's most vulnerable members. For example, Jews in the Middle Ages were accused of murdering Christian babies in ritual sacrifices. Black men in the United States were often lynched after being falsely accused of raping White women.

In a similar fashion, gay people have often been portrayed as a threat to children. Back in 1977, when Anita Bryant campaigned successfully to repeal a Dade County (FL) ordinance prohibiting anti-gay discrimination, she named her organization "Save Our Children," and warned that "a particularly deviant-minded [gay] teacher could sexually molest children."

In recent years, antigay activists have routinely asserted that gay people are child molesters. This argument was often made in debates about the Boy Scouts of America's policy to exclude gay scouts and scoutmasters. More recently, in the wake of Rep. Mark Foley's resignation from the US House of Representatives in 2006, antigay activists and their supporters seized on the scandal to revive this canard.

It has also been raised in connection with scandals about the Catholic church's attempts to cover up the abuse of young males by priests. Indeed, the Vatican's early response to the 2002 revelations of widespread Church cover-ups of sexual abuse by priests was to declare that gay men should not be ordained.

The number of Americans who believe the myth that gay people are child molesters has declined substantially. In a 1970 national survey, more than 70% of respondents agreed with the assertions that "Homosexuals are dangerous as teachers or youth leaders because they try to get sexually involved with children" or that "Homosexuals try to play sexually with children if they cannot get an adult
partner.


MANY MORE FACTS:

http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/h ... ation.html
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman."
User avatar
Gay Boy Bob
 
Posts: 3133
Joined: 20 Nov 2011, 10:06

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 10:31

edit
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18203
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Romero » 25 Jun 2012, 10:32

cc la tarte wrote:Right, an act of male / male rape i.e. an act of homosexual pedophilia

convenient "distinction", p a t h e t i c

I guess one has to live in lalaland to see the "distinction" with a straight ;) face ... unfucking real

HELP: I'm caught in mbland .. cc to earth .. cc to earth ...

Facts About Homosexuality and Child Molestation

Members of disliked minority groups are often stereotyped as representing a danger to the majority's most vulnerable members. For example, Jews in the Middle Ages were accused of murdering Christian babies in ritual sacrifices. Black men in the United States were often lynched after being falsely accused of raping White women.

In a similar fashion, gay people have often been portrayed as a threat to children. Back in 1977, when Anita Bryant campaigned successfully to repeal a Dade County (FL) ordinance prohibiting anti-gay discrimination, she named her organization "Save Our Children," and warned that "a particularly deviant-minded [gay] teacher could sexually molest children" (Bryant, 1977, p. 114). [Bibliographic references are on a different web page]

In recent years, antigay activists have routinely asserted that gay people are child molesters. This argument was often made in debates about the Boy Scouts of America's policy to exclude gay scouts and scoutmasters. More recently, in the wake of Rep. Mark Foley's resignation from the US House of Representatives in 2006, antigay activists and their supporters seized on the scandal to revive this canard.

It has also been raised in connection with scandals about the Catholic church's attempts to cover up the abuse of young males by priests. Indeed, the Vatican's early response to the 2002 revelations of widespread Church cover-ups of sexual abuse by priests was to declare that gay men should not be ordained.

Conclusion

The empirical research does not show that gay or bisexual men are any more likely than heterosexual men to molest children. This is not to argue that homosexual and bisexual men never molest children. But there is no scientific basis for asserting that they are more likely than heterosexual men to do so. And, as explained above, many child molesters cannot be characterized as having an adult sexual orientation at all; they are fixated on children.

http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/facts_molestation.html

Straight from the experts. Nice company you've got on your side, cc.

After all this time you couldn't take a couple of minutes to find the truth? I guess you just don't want to.

Sandusky didn't molest because he's homosexual. He molested because he's a molester.
If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything.
User avatar
Romero
 
Posts: 14548
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 20:48
Location: Vancouver

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 10:35

"rainbow/html" .. ummm ok, right

Back to earth
"What %age of the overall male population is gay?"

a simple number will do
Gay Boy Bob wrote:Here are some FACTS for certain posters .... bla bla .....Catholic church's .... divert divert ...

Diversion aside, > "What %age of the overall male population is gay?"

a simple number will do
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18203
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Romero » 25 Jun 2012, 10:41

Why does it matter what percentage of the overall male population is gay? It varies from around 3-15%.
If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything.
User avatar
Romero
 
Posts: 14548
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 20:48
Location: Vancouver

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 10:41

:D
ummmm .... pat questioned an estimate - but has yet to provide a real #
cc la tarte wrote: Back to earth
"What %age of the overall male population is gay?"

a simple number will do
Gay Boy Bob wrote:Here are some FACTS for certain posters .... bla bla .....Catholic church's .... divert divert ...

Diversion aside, > "What %age of the overall male population is gay?"

a simple number will do
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18203
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby mimi » 25 Jun 2012, 10:42

cc la tarte wrote:I have learned that in LaLaLand, young boy pedo victims can attempt to seek comfort in knowing that the homosexual act they were a victim of was not a really a homosexual act.[/b]"


As a matter of fact cc....that's EXACTLY what years of therapy tries to teach them.
mimi
 
Posts: 13591
Joined: 26 Aug 2011, 12:54

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Lochdubh » 25 Jun 2012, 10:44

He's the kind of chap who gives pederasts a bad name.
User avatar
Lochdubh
 
Posts: 16691
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 12:19

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Lochdubh » 25 Jun 2012, 10:46

mimi wrote:
cc la tarte wrote:I have learned that in LaLaLand, young boy pedo victims can attempt to seek comfort in knowing that the homosexual act they were a victim of was not a really a homosexual act.[/b]"


As a matter of fact cc....that's EXACTLY what years of therapy tries to teach them.



Good luck with that. I'd imagine it is difficult to forget that you had some old bastard's dick in your mouth or shoved up your wazoo, no matter what the trickcyclists say.
User avatar
Lochdubh
 
Posts: 16691
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 12:19

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Lochdubh » 25 Jun 2012, 10:47

cc la tarte wrote:Right, an act of male / male rape i.e. an act of homosexual pedophilia

convenient "distinction", p a t h e t i c

I guess one has to live in lalaland to see the "distinction" with a straight ;) face ... unfucking real

HELP: I'm caught in mbland .. cc to earth .. cc to earth ...





Grooound control to Major Tom.................
User avatar
Lochdubh
 
Posts: 16691
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 12:19

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 10:48

EXACTLY ^

Back to earth - Unfortunately there are many Sanduskys out there. My homosexual classmate boy pedo was many times smoooother than he, for one example

He was so smooooth he even ended up working in the office of his prison shrink ffs. Most people have no idea how smart these guys are at fooling people
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18203
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Lochdubh » 25 Jun 2012, 10:50

Shaved close did he?
User avatar
Lochdubh
 
Posts: 16691
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 12:19

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby mimi » 25 Jun 2012, 10:51

Lochdubh wrote:
mimi wrote:
As a matter of fact cc....that's EXACTLY what years of therapy tries to teach them.



Good luck with that. I'd imagine it is difficult to forget that you had some old bastard's dick in your mouth or shoved up your wazoo, no matter what the trickcyclist's say.

The purpose of therapy isn't to make them forget....it's to make them understand firstly...that what happened to them wasn't their fault...and secondly, that 'the act' is not a defining factor in their own sexual identity. CC would prefer that it was explained to them that they were involved in a homosexual act....but of course most of us know that isn't the case.
mimi
 
Posts: 13591
Joined: 26 Aug 2011, 12:54

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Gay Boy Bob » 25 Jun 2012, 10:53

CC wrote:
"Back to earth"What %age of the overall male population is gay?"

The number is, of course, impossible to verify. Why? Because of the hatred people like CC and Mundane exhibit. The kind of hatred and prejudice they exhibit helps keep many gay men and women closeted and in fear of coming out. And that's a fact.
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman."
User avatar
Gay Boy Bob
 
Posts: 3133
Joined: 20 Nov 2011, 10:06

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 10:53

ya. He out-shrinked his prison shrink
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18203
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Romero » 25 Jun 2012, 10:53

According to Dr. Fred Berlin, a Johns Hopkins University professor who founded the National Institute for the Study, Prevention and Treatment of Sexual Trauma in Baltimore, Md., pedophilia is a distinct sexual orientation marked by persistent, sometimes exclusive, attraction to prepubescent children.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,232584,00.html#ixzz1ypRS7KMB

No expert would find a connection between pedophilia and homosexuality.

Got anything to back up your claim, cc? Be careful.
If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything.
User avatar
Romero
 
Posts: 14548
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 20:48
Location: Vancouver

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Lochdubh » 25 Jun 2012, 10:54

My view is that they were mentally and/or physically coerced into participating in a homosexual act. I find it difficult to believe that they will in time come to forget the homosexual aspect of what went down.

If I get run over by a drunken bus driver, I doubt if I will be successful in forgetting the "bus" part of the event.
User avatar
Lochdubh
 
Posts: 16691
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 12:19

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 10:54

Gay Boy Bob wrote:CC wrote:
"Back to earth"What %age of the overall male population is gay?"

The number is, of course, impossible to verify. ..... Munday Munday .. bla bla
Right .. no answer ... and it's Munday's fault :D

Between that ludicrous embarrassing cop out post and others "male on male is not a homosexual act" .... I'm getting the picture here.

Alice to Wonderland!! ... Alice to Wonderland!! ... Helloooo!! ...over
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18203
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Lochdubh » 25 Jun 2012, 10:56

I blame Bush!
User avatar
Lochdubh
 
Posts: 16691
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 12:19

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Gay Boy Bob » 25 Jun 2012, 11:04

CC what is your point? Or do you have one? You ignore all logic, content to live in the distant Anita Bryant past.

From earlier post:

The empirical research does not show that gay or bisexual men are any more likely than heterosexual men to molest children. This is not to argue that homosexual and bisexual men never molest children. But there is no scientific basis for asserting that they are more likely than heterosexual men to do so. And, as explained above, many child molesters cannot be characterized as having an adult sexual orientation at all; they are fixated on children.
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman."
User avatar
Gay Boy Bob
 
Posts: 3133
Joined: 20 Nov 2011, 10:06

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby mimi » 25 Jun 2012, 11:06

Lochdubh wrote:My view is that they were mentally and/or physically coerced into participating in a homosexual act. I find it difficult to believe that they will in time come to forget the homosexual aspect of what went down.

If I get run over by a drunken bus driver, I doubt if I will be successful in forgetting the "bus" part of the event.

And the road to recovery would be in teaching them the danger was the drunken bus driver, not the bus.
mimi
 
Posts: 13591
Joined: 26 Aug 2011, 12:54

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Romero » 25 Jun 2012, 11:06

cc la tarte wrote:Between that ludicrous embarrassing cop out post and others "male on male is not a homosexual act" .... I'm getting the picture here.

Would you say male on female/female on male pedophilia are heterosexual acts?
If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything.
User avatar
Romero
 
Posts: 14548
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 20:48
Location: Vancouver

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby mimi » 25 Jun 2012, 11:08

Gay Boy Bob wrote:CC what is your point? Or do you have one? You ignore all logic, content to live in the distant Anita Bryant past.

It's easier to assume everyone else is out to lunch when you don't understand something.
mimi
 
Posts: 13591
Joined: 26 Aug 2011, 12:54

PreviousNext

Return to Vancouver Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Lochdubh and 25 guests