Board index ‹ Vancouver Forum

[cc la tarte]

All this to avoid a realistic estimate on the % of gay in the general population ?

A simple appropriate "simply put it in perspective please" question seems to be creating great havoc in LaLaLand .. people standing on their heads, twisting themselves into pretzels to avoid "simply putting it in perspective"

[Romero]

We've already answered that and you don't even know why you're asking.

[cc la tarte]

I must have missed it - a realistic estimate % between 0 & 100 is _______________

OK, homosexuality is a big issue for many here, but no one has any idea of the % whatsoever. OK

[Romero]

I said it varies around 3-15%. Here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_sexual_orientation

Why is it so difficult for you to take a couple of minutes to look something up? It's not that hard.

[cc la tarte]

3 - 15? - that's a realistic estimate?? .... "varies? wtf? ... It is was it is ... "varies"?

OK, It's a big issue for many here but no one interested in it has a frkn clue what ot its scope.

Settled.

[dick yamada]

I must have missed it - a realistic estimate % between 0 & 100 is _______________

OK, homosexuality is a big issue for many here, but no one has any idea of the % whatsoever. OK

Really? For whom?

[cc la tarte]

Sigh. Ok. I concede. No one cares about it here. It has never been mentioned. I was dreaming

While I got ya, any idea of its scope in numbers? You're a bit swifter than most here,. Just thought you might know

[Lochdubh]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debra_Lafave

[Romero]

3 - 15? - that's a realistic estimate?? .... "varies? wtf? ... It is was it is ... "varies"?

OK, It's a big issue for many here but no one interested in it has a frkn clue what ot its scope.

Settled.

It varies as in it's estimated to be 6% in Los Angeles and 15% in San Francisco.

Still too hard for you to figure out?

[Lochdubh]

It varies as in it's estimated to be 6% in Los Angeles and 15% in San Francisco.

Still too hard for you to figure out?

19% in Salt Lake City

[cc la tarte]

right ... and 60% in Mecca

[mimi]

3 - 15? - that's a realistic estimate?? .... "varies? wtf? ... It is was it is ... "varies"?

OK, It's a big issue for many here but no one interested in it has a frkn clue what ot its scope.

Settled.

I don't have 'a frkn clue what ot its scope'....but then again, I fail to see the relevance of it in relativity to a topic on pedophiles. I can see it could have relevance to Munday....because then he would have a better idea how much of the population are pedophiles.

[Gay Boy Bob]

Not at all. Just pointing out once again how wrong you are. Keep trying.

[quote="cc la tarte"]Defensive or what!! /quote]

[mimi]

I simply refuse to believe that cc hasn't realized she is wrong...but just doesn't know how to handle it. =)))

[cc la tarte]

Not at all. Just pointing out once again how wrong you are. Keep trying.

Defensive or what!! /quote]

Did you really say that?

I asked a question of you. There is no way a question can be "wrong" .... well ... except with LaLaLanders

Anyhow, Seems all those consistently interested in a topic have no clue as to the scope of the topic and no interst in its scope.
I'll do my own research.

[Romero]

I simply refuse to believe that cc hasn't realized she is wrong...but just doesn't know how to handle it. =)))

Indeed. She's spending all this time when all she has to do is take a couple of minutes to look it up and see for herself. She's even pretending not to know what the definition of "varies" is!

[cc la tarte]

only in LaLaLand .... only in LaLaLand ^

No facts here. I'll do my own research.

cc back to terra firma

[Lochdubh]

Not at all. Just pointing out once again how wrong you are. Keep trying.

Did you really say that?

I asked a question of you. There is no way a question can be "wrong" .... well ... except with LaLaLanders

Anyhow, Seems all those consistently interested in a topic have no clue as to the scope of the topic and no interst in its scope.
I'll do my own research.

No doubt it was your "intent" that has been found wanting.

[cc la tarte]

did you mean my "obvious evilness" ... for not toeing the party line of LaLaLand?

anyhow, gotta go back to terra firma

No sense wasting time with people who are consistently interested in a topic but have no clue as to the scope of the topic and most important have absolutely no interest in its scope .

[Romero]

only in LaLaLand .... only in LaLaLand ^

No facts here. I'll do my own research.

cc back to terra firma

Yeah? How many more days is it going to take for you to do a couple of minutes of research?

No sense wasting time with people who are consistently interested in a topic but have no clue as to the scope of the topic and most important no interest in its scope .

You won't even look into the topic. You've been assuming this whole time.

[Lochdubh]

did you mean my "obvious evilness" ... prolly as a result of not toeing the party line of LaLaLand?

anyhow, gotta go back to terra firma

No sense wasting time with people who are consistently interested in a topic have no clue as to the scope of the topic and no interst in its scope.

don't let that screen door slap you in the ass.

[dick yamada]

Sigh. Ok. I concede. No one cares about it here. It has never been mentioned. I was dreaming

While I got ya, any idea of its scope in numbers? You're a bit swifter than most here,. Just thought you might know

It was just a simple question. Who are the "many" to whom you refer?

I must have missed it - a realistic estimate % between 0 & 100 is _______________

OK, homosexuality is a big issue for many here, but no one has any idea of the % whatsoever. OK

Really? For whom?

[Zekko]

..

there is only one love.

1. bob marley was no saint... and he likely would have supported the extermination of homosexuals

2. everything you need to know about this subject can be learned in a sid davis film

[mimi]

I'll do my own research.

It's about time.

[cc la tarte]

rw?

[mimi]

What does rw mean ?

[Lochdubh]

right wing?
real Woman?
real world?

[Gay Boy Bob]

rabid wingnut?

[mimi]

I never understand your code messages, cc. =)))

[Munday]

You can look it up for yourself or you can choose to remain ignorant.

Or you can resort to sarcastic remarks, turn it into a joke or try to discredit anyone who might be more informed on the subject.

well that let's you off the hook...talk about the uninformed discussing gay issues with the misinformed with chirps from the chloroformed and ribbits from the mentally deformed and even the usual suck up shit from the uniformed....typical thread at the gay memebee forum