Board index Vancouver Forum


Vancouver forum is an open forum which daily sketches the diversity and the commonality of Vancouverites. It is also an online community where you can discover and discuss various aspects of life in Vancouver and the world at large. If you are a visitor or a soon-to-be resident of Vancouver, or simply have an interest in it, you are more than welcome to join the group of Vancouver Forum posters, but know that any questions you may have about the city and its neighborhoods, the quality of life and lifestyle, are likely going to be met with a barrage of insults by some our resident comedians.

If you are a Vancouverite who just stumbled upon these pages, you'd best get the hell out of here before anyone sees you, but if you do decide to join in, for God's sake don't tell them your ethnicity or you may never hear the end of it! Do not be surprised by uncensored and sometimes blatantly stupid, crazy, remarks that shouldn't ever be spoken in private, let alone on a public forum. If that still hasn't deterred you, then you probably have a thick enough skin and a good enough sense of humour to handle this place. Good luck. You're going to need it!


Register your free accountRead the forum rules

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 11:51

All this to avoid a realistic estimate on the % of gay in the general population ?
A simple appropriate "simply put it in perspective please" question seems to be creating great havoc in LaLaLand .. people standing on their heads, twisting themselves into pretzels to avoid "simply putting it in perspective"
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18200
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Advertisement

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Romero » 25 Jun 2012, 11:54

We've already answered that and you don't even know why you're asking.
If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything.
User avatar
Romero
 
Posts: 14547
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 20:48
Location: Vancouver

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 11:56

I must have missed it - a realistic estimate % between 0 & 100 is _______________

OK, homosexuality is a big issue for many here, but no one has any idea of the % whatsoever. OK
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18200
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Romero » 25 Jun 2012, 12:02

I said it varies around 3-15%. Here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_sexual_orientation

Why is it so difficult for you to take a couple of minutes to look something up? It's not that hard.
If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything.
User avatar
Romero
 
Posts: 14547
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 20:48
Location: Vancouver

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 12:12

3 - 15? - that's a realistic estimate?? .... "varies? wtf? ... It is was it is ... "varies"?

OK, It's a big issue for many here but no one interested in it has a frkn clue what ot its scope.

Settled.
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18200
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby dick yamada » 25 Jun 2012, 12:16

cc la tarte wrote:I must have missed it - a realistic estimate % between 0 & 100 is _______________

OK, homosexuality is a big issue for many here, but no one has any idea of the % whatsoever. OK


Really? For whom?
Excelsior!
User avatar
dick yamada
 
Posts: 11954
Joined: 20 Aug 2009, 10:46

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 12:19

Sigh. Ok. I concede. No one cares about it here. It has never been mentioned. I was dreaming

While I got ya, any idea of its scope in numbers? You're a bit swifter than most here,. Just thought you might know
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18200
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Lochdubh » 25 Jun 2012, 12:19

User avatar
Lochdubh
 
Posts: 16668
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 12:19

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Romero » 25 Jun 2012, 12:20

cc la tarte wrote:3 - 15? - that's a realistic estimate?? .... "varies? wtf? ... It is was it is ... "varies"?

OK, It's a big issue for many here but no one interested in it has a frkn clue what ot its scope.

Settled.

It varies as in it's estimated to be 6% in Los Angeles and 15% in San Francisco.

Still too hard for you to figure out?
If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything.
User avatar
Romero
 
Posts: 14547
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 20:48
Location: Vancouver

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Lochdubh » 25 Jun 2012, 12:21

Romero wrote:It varies as in it's estimated to be 6% in Los Angeles and 15% in San Francisco.

Still too hard for you to figure out?



19% in Salt Lake City
User avatar
Lochdubh
 
Posts: 16668
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 12:19

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 12:27

right :D ... and 60% in Mecca
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18200
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby mimi » 25 Jun 2012, 12:29

cc la tarte wrote:3 - 15? - that's a realistic estimate?? .... "varies? wtf? ... It is was it is ... "varies"?

OK, It's a big issue for many here but no one interested in it has a frkn clue what ot its scope.

Settled.

I don't have 'a frkn clue what ot its scope'....but then again, I fail to see the relevance of it in relativity to a topic on pedophiles. I can see it could have relevance to Munday....because then he would have a better idea how much of the population are pedophiles. :rolleyes:
mimi
 
Posts: 13591
Joined: 26 Aug 2011, 12:54

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Gay Boy Bob » 25 Jun 2012, 12:41

Not at all. Just pointing out once again how wrong you are. Keep trying.

[quote="cc la tarte"]Defensive or what!! /quote]
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman."
User avatar
Gay Boy Bob
 
Posts: 3128
Joined: 20 Nov 2011, 10:06

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby mimi » 25 Jun 2012, 13:05

I simply refuse to believe that cc hasn't realized she is wrong...but just doesn't know how to handle it. =)))
mimi
 
Posts: 13591
Joined: 26 Aug 2011, 12:54

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 13:07

Gay Boy Bob wrote:Not at all. Just pointing out once again how wrong you are. Keep trying.

cc la tarte wrote:Defensive or what!! /quote]
Did you really say that?

I asked a question of you. There is no way a question can be "wrong" .... well ... except with LaLaLanders

Anyhow, Seems all those consistently interested in a topic have no clue as to the scope of the topic and no interst in its scope.
I'll do my own research.
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18200
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Romero » 25 Jun 2012, 13:11

mimi wrote:I simply refuse to believe that cc hasn't realized she is wrong...but just doesn't know how to handle it. =)))

Indeed. She's spending all this time when all she has to do is take a couple of minutes to look it up and see for herself. She's even pretending not to know what the definition of "varies" is!
If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything.
User avatar
Romero
 
Posts: 14547
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 20:48
Location: Vancouver

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 13:13

only in LaLaLand .... only in LaLaLand ^

No facts here. I'll do my own research.

cc back to terra firma
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18200
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Lochdubh » 25 Jun 2012, 13:13

cc la tarte wrote:
Gay Boy Bob wrote:Not at all. Just pointing out once again how wrong you are. Keep trying.

Did you really say that?

I asked a question of you. There is no way a question can be "wrong" .... well ... except with LaLaLanders

Anyhow, Seems all those consistently interested in a topic have no clue as to the scope of the topic and no interst in its scope.
I'll do my own research.



No doubt it was your "intent" that has been found wanting.
User avatar
Lochdubh
 
Posts: 16668
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 12:19

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 13:16

did you mean my "obvious evilness" ... for not toeing the party line of LaLaLand?

anyhow, gotta go back to terra firma

No sense wasting time with people who are consistently interested in a topic but have no clue as to the scope of the topic and most important have absolutely no interest in its scope .
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18200
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Romero » 25 Jun 2012, 13:17

cc la tarte wrote:only in LaLaLand .... only in LaLaLand ^

No facts here. I'll do my own research.

cc back to terra firma

Yeah? How many more days is it going to take for you to do a couple of minutes of research?

cc la tarte wrote:No sense wasting time with people who are consistently interested in a topic but have no clue as to the scope of the topic and most important no interest in its scope .

You won't even look into the topic. You've been assuming this whole time.
If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything.
User avatar
Romero
 
Posts: 14547
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 20:48
Location: Vancouver

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Lochdubh » 25 Jun 2012, 13:20

cc la tarte wrote:did you mean my "obvious evilness" ... prolly as a result of not toeing the party line of LaLaLand?

anyhow, gotta go back to terra firma

No sense wasting time with people who are consistently interested in a topic have no clue as to the scope of the topic and no interst in its scope.



don't let that screen door slap you in the ass. :eyebrow:
User avatar
Lochdubh
 
Posts: 16668
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 12:19

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby dick yamada » 25 Jun 2012, 13:25

cc la tarte wrote:Sigh. Ok. I concede. No one cares about it here. It has never been mentioned. I was dreaming

While I got ya, any idea of its scope in numbers? You're a bit swifter than most here,. Just thought you might know


It was just a simple question. Who are the "many" to whom you refer?

dick yamada wrote:
cc la tarte wrote:I must have missed it - a realistic estimate % between 0 & 100 is _______________

OK, homosexuality is a big issue for many here, but no one has any idea of the % whatsoever. OK


Really? For whom?
Excelsior!
User avatar
dick yamada
 
Posts: 11954
Joined: 20 Aug 2009, 10:46

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Zekko » 25 Jun 2012, 13:26

bobb wrote:..

there is only one love.


1. bob marley was no saint... and he likely would have supported the extermination of homosexuals

2. everything you need to know about this subject can be learned in a sid davis film
now you have caused the madness... now you shall have the madness
User avatar
Zekko
 
Posts: 2302
Joined: 02 Oct 2008, 14:48
Location: Shitland

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby mimi » 25 Jun 2012, 13:30

cc la tarte wrote:I'll do my own research.


It's about time.
mimi
 
Posts: 13591
Joined: 26 Aug 2011, 12:54

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 14:21

rw? ;)
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18200
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby mimi » 25 Jun 2012, 14:22

What does rw mean ?
mimi
 
Posts: 13591
Joined: 26 Aug 2011, 12:54

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Lochdubh » 25 Jun 2012, 14:57

right wing?
real Woman?
real world?
User avatar
Lochdubh
 
Posts: 16668
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 12:19

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Gay Boy Bob » 25 Jun 2012, 15:01

rabid wingnut?
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman."
User avatar
Gay Boy Bob
 
Posts: 3128
Joined: 20 Nov 2011, 10:06

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby mimi » 25 Jun 2012, 15:05

I never understand your code messages, cc. =)))
mimi
 
Posts: 13591
Joined: 26 Aug 2011, 12:54

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Munday » 25 Jun 2012, 18:06

mimi wrote:
Romero wrote:You can look it up for yourself or you can choose to remain ignorant.

Or you can resort to sarcastic remarks, turn it into a joke or try to discredit anyone who might be more informed on the subject.


well that let's you off the hook...talk about the uninformed discussing gay issues with the misinformed with chirps from the chloroformed and ribbits from the mentally deformed and even the usual suck up shit from the uniformed....typical thread at the gay memebee forum
This poster strongly disavows any knowledge about any subject and furthermore takes no responsibility for any comments posted under the name of Munday.
User avatar
Munday
 
Posts: 5351
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 10:31
Location: Paradise.....Saskatchewan

PreviousNext

Return to Vancouver Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Gay Boy Bob, Google [Bot], kiebers, Scooter and 21 guests