Board index Vancouver Forum


Vancouver forum is an open forum which daily sketches the diversity and the commonality of Vancouverites. It is also an online community where you can discover and discuss various aspects of life in Vancouver and the world at large. If you are a visitor or a soon-to-be resident of Vancouver, or simply have an interest in it, you are more than welcome to join the group of Vancouver Forum posters, but know that any questions you may have about the city and its neighborhoods, the quality of life and lifestyle, are likely going to be met with a barrage of insults by some our resident comedians.

If you are a Vancouverite who just stumbled upon these pages, you'd best get the hell out of here before anyone sees you, but if you do decide to join in, for God's sake don't tell them your ethnicity or you may never hear the end of it! Do not be surprised by uncensored and sometimes blatantly stupid, crazy, remarks that shouldn't ever be spoken in private, let alone on a public forum. If that still hasn't deterred you, then you probably have a thick enough skin and a good enough sense of humour to handle this place. Good luck. You're going to need it!


Register your free accountRead the forum rules

Cuban Missile Crisis

Unread postby GD » 19 Aug 2012, 17:53

Just wondering...

What do you suppose would have happened if the Russians HADN'T backed down?
User avatar
GD
 
Posts: 4824
Joined: 23 Sep 2009, 10:47

Advertisement

Re: Cuban Missile Crisis

Unread postby richie » 19 Aug 2012, 18:30

this..

Image
richie
 
Posts: 2328
Joined: 25 Nov 2008, 11:07

Re: Cuban Missile Crisis

Unread postby GD » 19 Aug 2012, 19:39

What's that?
User avatar
GD
 
Posts: 4824
Joined: 23 Sep 2009, 10:47

Re: Cuban Missile Crisis

Unread postby cc la tarte » 19 Aug 2012, 22:50

Actually, Khrushchev was a class act on that one in my book.

He knew the "kid" the US had elected was not very bright and had childishly got himself in a pickle and would / could not back off ... and knew that only if he, Nikita, backed off would no bombs go off

A rare bright and BRAVE moment in USSR history. He got fired not too long after but is one of very few political "true heros" to me

Sometimes sticking to it if it means lives is gutless .... and backing off to save lives is true bravery
.
"The Future Must Not Belong to Those Who Slander the Prophet of Islam" BHO, @UN, Sept 25, 2012.
Now, wanna talk about "his Sweetest Sound @ Sunset AllahuAkbars? his ME Muslim B'Hood?, his Morsi? Syria? Why Not??
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 17837
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Re: Cuban Missile Crisis

Unread postby GranpaP » 19 Aug 2012, 22:57

During the Cuban Missile Crisis, the US Strategic Air Command was placed on DEFCON 2 for the first time in history, while the rest of US military commands (with the exception of the US Air Forces in Europe) went on DEFCON 3. On 22 October 1962 SAC responded by establishing Defense Condition Three (DEFCON III), and ordered B-52s on airborne alert. Tension grew and the next day SAC declared DEFCON II, a heightened state of alert, ready to strike targets within the Soviet Union.


On 15 November 1965 the day Strategic Air Command (SAC) postured down to defense condition (DEFCON) III.

On 6 October 1973 Egyptian and Syrian forces launched a surprise attack on Israel. On 25 October U.S. forces went on Defense Condition (DEFCON) III alert status, as possible intervention by the Soviet Union was feared. On 26 October, CINCSAC and CINCONAD reverted to normal DEFCON status. On 31 October USEUCOM (less the Sixth Fleet) went off DEFCON III status. The Sixth Fleet resumed its normal DEFCON status on 17 November 1973
GranpaP
 
Posts: 5015
Joined: 26 May 2011, 08:59

Re: Cuban Missile Crisis

Unread postby GD » 19 Aug 2012, 23:11

Ouch! My ears are getting Defcon from all the SHOUTING!
User avatar
GD
 
Posts: 4824
Joined: 23 Sep 2009, 10:47

Re: Cuban Missile Crisis

Unread postby Leopardsocks » 20 Aug 2012, 05:22

cc la tarte wrote:Actually, Khrushchev was a class act on that one in my book.

He knew the "kid" the US had elected was not very bright and had childishly got himself in a pickle and would / could not back off ... and knew that only if he, Nikita, backed off would no bombs go off

A rare bright and BRAVE moment in USSR history. He got fired not too long after but is one of very few political "true heros" to me

Sometimes sticking to it if it means lives is gutless .... and backing off to save lives is true bravery


Ah...you should read Kruschev's memoirs...whatever he did, it was not courage that drove his decision making, but mathematics.

But he got US missiles out of Turkey, so he wasn't too disappointed.
Why so serious?
User avatar
Leopardsocks
 
Posts: 5391
Joined: 16 Sep 2011, 18:16

Re: Cuban Missile Crisis

Unread postby EU » 20 Aug 2012, 08:14

The Turkish missiles were paramount and the mathematics were that the US was winning the arms race.
evs wrote:now now cc, that's crazy talk:)
EU
 
Posts: 5837
Joined: 18 Aug 2011, 09:34

Cuban Missile Crisis

Unread postby Leopardsocks » 20 Aug 2012, 16:46

Correctamundo.
Why so serious?
User avatar
Leopardsocks
 
Posts: 5391
Joined: 16 Sep 2011, 18:16


Return to Vancouver Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], GAMBINO and 9 guests