Board index Vancouver Forum


Vancouver forum is an open forum which daily sketches the diversity and the commonality of Vancouverites. It is also an online community where you can discover and discuss various aspects of life in Vancouver and the world at large. If you are a visitor or a soon-to-be resident of Vancouver, or simply have an interest in it, you are more than welcome to join the group of Vancouver Forum posters, but know that any questions you may have about the city and its neighborhoods, the quality of life and lifestyle, are likely going to be met with a barrage of insults by some our resident comedians.

If you are a Vancouverite who just stumbled upon these pages, you'd best get the hell out of here before anyone sees you, but if you do decide to join in, for God's sake don't tell them your ethnicity or you may never hear the end of it! Do not be surprised by uncensored and sometimes blatantly stupid, crazy, remarks that shouldn't ever be spoken in private, let alone on a public forum. If that still hasn't deterred you, then you probably have a thick enough skin and a good enough sense of humour to handle this place. Good luck. You're going to need it!


Register your free accountRead the forum rules

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 11:08

You questioned my estimate / range

You live and breath and fill the site with homosexual news

YET!!

you can't even give an educated estimate let alone a hard number on the % of males involved?

.01? - 100? is quite a range

All I'm asking is for you to put it into perspective for us, please
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18179
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Advertisement

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Lochdubh » 25 Jun 2012, 11:09

How would most adolescent males respond if seduced or ravished by a female authority (teacher/coach) figure? Would extensive counseling typically be necessary? Decades later, would they feel that their life had been blighted?
User avatar
Lochdubh
 
Posts: 16658
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 12:19

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Lochdubh » 25 Jun 2012, 11:10

cc la tarte wrote:You live and breath and fill the site with homosexual news

YET!!

you can't even give an estimate let alone a hard number on the % of males involved in it?

.01? - 100? is quite a range



"hard number"................please, Missis, live and let live. :mad:
User avatar
Lochdubh
 
Posts: 16658
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 12:19

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Lochdubh » 25 Jun 2012, 11:11

Romero wrote:
cc la tarte wrote:Between that ludicrous embarrassing cop out post and others "male on male is not a homosexual act" .... I'm getting the picture here.

Would you say male on female/female on male pedophilia are heterosexual acts?

Yes, I would. Illegal heterosexual acts.
User avatar
Lochdubh
 
Posts: 16658
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 12:19

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 11:13

Of course ^ .. however in the upside-down world here, they might even be called defined as legal homosexual acts ;)

I guess asking the % of male homosexuals in society was a homoFAUXbic question. Bad me!!
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18179
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Romero » 25 Jun 2012, 11:19

Lochdubh wrote:Yes, I would. Illegal heterosexual acts.

You would be wrong, according to expert consensus. Pedophilia has nothing to do with sexual orientation.
If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything.
User avatar
Romero
 
Posts: 14537
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 20:48
Location: Vancouver

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Lochdubh » 25 Jun 2012, 11:20

I've been wrong before, but so has "expert concensus". go back a few editions of the DSM and homosexuality was viewed as a personality disorder. ;)
User avatar
Lochdubh
 
Posts: 16658
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 12:19

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 11:20

So, a heterosexual act is not a heterosexual act & a homosexual act is not a homosexual act in this upside-down world here

OK. Just so I know how things work here
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18179
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Lochdubh » 25 Jun 2012, 11:21

Sit back and let the "experts" decide for you.
/You'll thank me later.
//It won't hurt much.
User avatar
Lochdubh
 
Posts: 16658
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 12:19

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 11:22

:D Right, our resident Ex-Spurts

You know the definition of "Ex-Spurt" I'm guessin
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18179
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby mimi » 25 Jun 2012, 11:23

Lochdubh wrote:How would most adolescent males respond if seduced or ravished by a female authority (teacher/coach) figure? Would extensive counseling typically be necessary? Decades later, would they feel that their life had been blighted?


While attractiveness may alter the experience, it doesn't alter trust issues or issues around intimacy and relationships.
mimi
 
Posts: 13591
Joined: 26 Aug 2011, 12:54

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Romero » 25 Jun 2012, 11:24

cc la tarte wrote::D Right, our resident Ex-Spurts

You can look it up for yourself or you can choose to remain ignorant.
If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything.
User avatar
Romero
 
Posts: 14537
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 20:48
Location: Vancouver

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Gay Boy Bob » 25 Jun 2012, 11:25

How many grains of sand are there in the Sahara? Impossible to know. Just as it is impossible to know how many gays/lesbians there are in the world.



cc la tarte wrote:You questioned my estimate / range

You live and breath and fill the site with homosexual news

YET!!

you can't even give an educated estimate let alone a hard number on the % of males involved?

.01? - 100? is quite a range

All I'm asking is for you to put it into perspective for us, please
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman."
User avatar
Gay Boy Bob
 
Posts: 3122
Joined: 20 Nov 2011, 10:06

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby evs » 25 Jun 2012, 11:25

..

there is only one love.
no pasarán
User avatar
evs
 
Posts: 11299
Joined: 15 Jun 2012, 14:33

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 11:26

Don't need to look it up - "Ex Spurt"

"EX" = former / past / no more

"Spurt" = a limp momentary stream of wate
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18179
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 11:26

Gay Boy Bob wrote:How many grains of sand are there in the Sahara? Impossible to know. Just as it is impossible to know how many gays/lesbians there are in the world.



cc la tarte wrote:You questioned my estimate / range

You live and breath and fill the site with homosexual news

YET!!

you can't even give an educated estimate let alone a hard number on the % of males involved?

.01? - 100? is quite a range

All I'm asking is for you to put it into perspective for us, please
"How many grains of sand are there in the Sahara?" Lame answer :D :D
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18179
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby mimi » 25 Jun 2012, 11:27

Romero wrote:
cc la tarte wrote::D Right, our resident Ex-Spurts

You can look it up for yourself or you can choose to remain ignorant.

Or you can resort to sarcastic remarks, turn it into a joke or try to discredit anyone who might be more informed on the subject.
mimi
 
Posts: 13591
Joined: 26 Aug 2011, 12:54

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Lochdubh » 25 Jun 2012, 11:28

bobb wrote:..

there is only one love.



Saint Bob Marley
User avatar
Lochdubh
 
Posts: 16658
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 12:19

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 11:29

Comon Pat - a solid estimate between 1 & 100

Is it a major huge part of society or a teeny weeny part

Frame / roughly quantify this whole gay thing for us, please.
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18179
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby dick yamada » 25 Jun 2012, 11:29

Are you picking up now?!
Excelsior!
User avatar
dick yamada
 
Posts: 11954
Joined: 20 Aug 2009, 10:46

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Romero » 25 Jun 2012, 11:30

mimi wrote:Or you can resort to sarcastic remarks, turn it into a joke or try to discredit anyone who might be more informed on the subject.

Ironic how once again she sides with religious fundamentalists.
If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything.
User avatar
Romero
 
Posts: 14537
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 20:48
Location: Vancouver

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby mimi » 25 Jun 2012, 11:31

Romero wrote:
mimi wrote:Or you can resort to sarcastic remarks, turn it into a joke or try to discredit anyone who might be more informed on the subject.

Ironic how once again she sides with religious fundamentalists.

And Munday. :D
mimi
 
Posts: 13591
Joined: 26 Aug 2011, 12:54

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby mimi » 25 Jun 2012, 11:31

dick yamada wrote:Are you picking up now?!

rofl

Not yet.
mimi
 
Posts: 13591
Joined: 26 Aug 2011, 12:54

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Romero » 25 Jun 2012, 11:32

:D
If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything.
User avatar
Romero
 
Posts: 14537
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 20:48
Location: Vancouver

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 11:34

How many grains of sand are there in the Sahara?
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18179
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 11:35

dick yamada wrote:Are you picking up now?!
YUP!! I am. Got it now.

I've entered LALALand
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18179
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Gay Boy Bob » 25 Jun 2012, 11:37

CC wrote about me: "You live and breath and fill the site with homosexual news"


Not so, CC. You're like a horse with faulty blinkers.

In the past three days I have posted many topics that have nothing to do with 'homosexual news'

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=37615
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=37561
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=37561
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=37617
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=37538
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=37526
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=37514
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=37531
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman."
User avatar
Gay Boy Bob
 
Posts: 3122
Joined: 20 Nov 2011, 10:06

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby cc la tarte » 25 Jun 2012, 11:40

Defensive or what!! Also MANY gay issues, as I ACCURATELY said before. Not judging that, just stating a fact

And as you do post much gay stuff, it is appropriate to ask you to provide a % of gay in the general population

All this to avoid an estimate on the % of gay in the general population ? Still no estimate
The Paradox of Tolerance:
"Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance ..
If we extend tolerance to the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" ~ Sir Karl Popper

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ~ Thomas Mann
User avatar
cc la tarte
 
Posts: 18179
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 13:11

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby mimi » 25 Jun 2012, 11:41

What difference does it make.
mimi
 
Posts: 13591
Joined: 26 Aug 2011, 12:54

Re: Sandusky guilty

Unread postby Gay Boy Bob » 25 Jun 2012, 11:44

LOL

cc la tarte wrote: it is appropriate to ask you to provide a % of gay in the general population
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman."
User avatar
Gay Boy Bob
 
Posts: 3122
Joined: 20 Nov 2011, 10:06

PreviousNext

Return to Vancouver Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], extralegs2000, Google [Bot], intermess, Lochdubh, the shark hunter and 15 guests