Page 2 of 2

Obama wants gun violence measures passed in 2013

Posted: January 1st, 2013, 10:33 pm
by Gary Oak
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20121230/DA3GBHA00.html

The white liberal lefties love Obama however I am certain that the reason he really wants to take your guns is really that exact reason that the great minds who created the masterpiece that is the American constitution added that everybody has the right to bear arms. Hitler took away the guns, the Japanese took away the guns swords even knives etc... Do not let them take your guns. Obama knows exactly why he wants to take the guns. Yes he acts so concerned about people but I am certain that it has nothing to do with concern for American citizens at all. but rather for a very evil agenda

Re: Obama Is Coming For Your Guns

Posted: January 1st, 2013, 10:36 pm
by Blue Frost
They will get some kind of unconstitutional act passed.

Re: Obama Is Coming For Your Guns

Posted: January 1st, 2013, 10:43 pm
by Gary Oak
This is a scary scenario as I am certain that something is planned where Americans will need their guns

Re: Obama Is Coming For Your Guns

Posted: January 1st, 2013, 10:50 pm
by Blue Frost
Of course, they want the UN in charge of us, and the constitution, your charters tossed out the door.
Any politician for this stuff needs held for treason.

Re: Obama Is Coming For Your Guns

Posted: October 9th, 2015, 12:41 pm
by Gary Oak
And I believe that is exactly why Obama's handlers are having him constantly trying to take Americans guns away.

Carson: There's a reason dictators 'take the guns first'


Re: Obama Is Coming For Your Guns

Posted: October 9th, 2015, 2:16 pm
by Blue Frost
Wont happen, yet anyway.
There is enough unregistered guns, and stolen ones it will never stop the bad people from doing stuff.
If they want to do something the feds need to do a real background check, stop the roadside sales, and make them go legal, and people like Obama needs to stop letting bad people out of prison for a vote.
Also the Obama types need to stop agitating the nuts like in that church shooting causing a fake racial issue causing tensions, and hatred.

A gun is a tool not a killer, it takes a nut to misuse one.

Re: Obama Is Coming For Your Guns

Posted: March 20th, 2016, 3:26 pm
by Gary Oak
Obama is very determined to make the American public defencless against the muslim terrorists that he is flooding into the USA. The great minds who put the constitution together knew how the elite would try to take the freedoms away. Obama studied the constitution so he would be adept at downgrading it as much as possible. Hopefully there are enough loyal patriotic senators to keep him from having too much success. Read some tof the comments below and maybe you might even want to open the page and make a comment yourself.


Every Gun Owner In America Should Read This About Obama’s Supreme Court Nominee

http://www.offthegridnews.com/current-e ... t-nominee/



President Obama’s nominee to fill Antonin Scalia’s seat on the US Supreme Court would vote to limit Second Amendment rights if he is confirmed, observers contend.

Obama nominated Merrick Garland, the chief judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, to replace Scalia, who died last month on March 16, 2016.

Currently, the court’s makeup is tied, 4-4, on gun rights.

“Garland has a long record, and, among other things, it leads to the conclusion that he would vote to reverse one of Justice Scalia’s most important opinions, D.C. vs. Heller, which affirmed that the Second Amendment confers an individual right to keep and bear arms,” Carrie Severino wrote in The National Review.

Do You Know The Best Way To Hide Your Guns?

In 2007 Garland tried to undue a pro-gun federal court ruling that had overturned a Washington D.C. law that banned private ownership of handguns, Severino noted.

“A three-judge panel struck down the ban, but Judge Garland wanted to reconsider that ruling. He voted with Judge David Tatel, one of the most liberal judges on that court,” Severino wrote.

That law was later overturned by the Supreme Court in Heller, in which the justices ruled that the Second Amendment protects private gun ownership.

In an earlier case, Garland ruled that the Clinton administration had a right to retain records of gun buyers for six months, Severino noted. That violated a 1968 federal law in which Congress banned gun registration.

garland“Garland thought all of these regulations were legal, which tells us two things,” Severino wrote. “First, it tells us that he has a very liberal view of gun rights, since he apparently wanted to undo a key court victory protecting them. Second, it tells us that he’s willing to uphold executive actions that violate the rights of gun owners. That’s not so moderate, is it?”

Reliable Liberal?

George Mason University Law Professor Ilya Somin wrote in a Washington Post column that “it is unlikely that Obama would have nominated Garland if he were not going to be a reliable liberal vote on most major issues that might come before the Supreme Court.”

Vicious New Hand-Held Self-Defense Tool Turns Lethal In Seconds!

Somin, a conservative, actually believes it might be a good idea for the US Senate to confirm Garland’s nomination. Somin fears that Hillary Clinton will win the election and try to appoint someone further to the left than Garland.

The National Rifle Association opposes Garland’s nomination.

“A basic analysis of Merrick Garland’s judicial record shows that he does not respect our fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense,” Chris W. Cox of the National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA) said in a press release.

Cox noted that the court is currently evenly divided between pro-Second Amendment conservatives and pro-gun rights liberals.

“With Justice Scalia’s tragic passing, there is no longer a majority of support among the justices for the fundamental, individual right to own a firearm for self-defense,” Cox wrote. “Four justices believe law-abiding Americans have that right – and four justices do not.”

Are you concerned about President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee? Share your thoughts in the section below:



Not So Free

March 17, 2016 at 7:27 pm



It’s not just the 2nd Amendment he’s wrong on.
.
Google his rulings.

Reply


James. Roney

March 17, 2016 at 7:55 pm



People remember a right is not a privilege, to be altered in any way by ANYONE. No matter who they think they are. Its time for people to actually stand up for there God given rights I want you to think for a minute why did Jesus-Yashua allow his disciples to carry swords start defending yourself and loved one’s no person on this earth has power over you unless you give it to them.

Reply


willymaer

March 19, 2016 at 10:35 am



You are so right.
The constitution only describes the rights people have naturally, not rights given by anyone. By all definitions, the supreme court is simply just another court by the government who the constitution restricts authority and has no more more authority to decide what a right is to begin with.
We act as though the supreme courts decisions are the final say. Nothing could be further from the truth- it is just another “opinion” derived from a plethora of legal terms and words meant to confuse an issue to the people in order to favor the supreme courts agenda.
The 2nd amendment (all amendments) does not belong to the courts or lawyers to decide it’s content. Their rulings must be by the “Consent” of the people!

Reply

Gabriel de Orozco

March 18, 2016 at 2:04 pm



What everyone fails to interpret and understand, regarding the Second Amendment of the Constitution, a brilliant document enacted by men the like we will probably never see again, is the written fact that it was drafted to prevent tyranny above all. Nowhere does it claim the right to a citizen to own a weapon for the simple sake of personal defense or his family’s. It DOES say in fact…that the right of a well armed militia should be guaranteed. This is in direct opposition to a tyrannical ruler, or monarchy, infringement of the right of individual states and/or citizens. In other words, to prevent the Federal Government from exercising unreasonable and forceful mandates over the nation, without the proper representation and consent. We have the right by the Second Amendment, to rise in opposition to federal dictatorial mandates, armed if necessary, to maintain our basic freedoms as guaranteed under the Constitution. The left wingers understand this right and will do whatever is necessary to abolish this right. In the meantime, while Americans are at each others throat arguing whether is Trump or Hillary for President, Obama and his entourage are headed to a Caribbean vacation with the longest running totalitarian, communist dictatorship in the history of the hemisphere. On the sweat of the AMERICAN taxpayer’s penny, and by exercising well abused Executive Power.

Reply

Rob

March 18, 2016 at 7:57 pm



You forgot the shall not be infringed part.

Reply

willymaer

March 19, 2016 at 10:38 am



Upon which has been violated already- many times over.

Reply


Ron Johnson

March 19, 2016 at 2:49 pm



The clause in the Second Amendment concerning the ‘well regulated militia’ is subordinate to ‘the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.’ The opening clause sets the rationale, the second clause states the law. It is hard to understand how highly educated lawyers and justices can fail to understand the simple language of the Constitution. I believe the ‘misunderstanding’ is willfull.

Reply


Derfius

March 19, 2016 at 11:14 am



Merrick Garland was the lead Fed prosecutor of Timothy McVeigh in the Oklahoma City/Murrah Fed building bombing.

Clearly, the truck bomb delivered by stooge McVeigh was responsible for a mere pittance, a very small percentage, of the damage that building sustained. Much like the 9/11 WTC “attacks,” the building/bomb scene was roped off and hauled away without any serious govn’t investigation.

Merrick Garland was in charge. He is a totally corrupt and compromised left authoritarian. He’s ready to go after all those angry white male terrorists tomorrow, just like he went after patsy McVeigh.


March 19, 2016 at 4:43 pm



The Right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

How in the crap is that not clear enough? Who makes the militia? The people. There Armed forces? The people.

Should I own a gun? yes. Do I own one? No. Can my right to own a gun be taken? F***ING try it.

Re: Obama Is Coming For Your Guns

Posted: June 18th, 2016, 3:47 pm
by Gary Oak
I jdon't believe that Obama is stupid at all. I believe that he wants Americans killed, I believe that he wants to destroy the USA and hates the constitution that he studied in university. His Handlers want to get rid of that constitution.


Palin - Obama Is A Special Kind
Of STUPID - Asinine Gun Control

Statement by Sarah Palin
6-17-16

- See more at: http://rense.com/general96/palinguns.ht ... 7CdQz.dpuf

Enough is enough, 'Mr. President.' There's no "due respect" due you after pulling this stunt.

Exploiting a sick, evil, ideological-driven attack on Americans to further your twisted anti-Second Amendment mission is disgusting. Today you're demanding an "explanation" from law abiding gun owners, but not demanding the same from followers of Islam, the religion behind this terror?

If the demented Orlando terrorist doesn't represent all Islamic followers, then why do you insinuate he represents all gun owners?

And why, after any shooting, do you always want to take away firearms from the innocent people who didn't do it?

Forget your ASININE gun control, do your job and engage in Islamic terrorist control.

Yes, it's a special kind of stupid to demand we explain ourselves. But if you really want them, get ready for our explanations. Here's mine:
http://injo.com/2016/06/631166-hold-pre ... tive-daily

- Sarah Palin
- See more at: http://rense.com/general96/palinguns.ht ... 7CdQz.dpuf

Re: Obama Is Coming For Your Guns

Posted: June 18th, 2016, 5:18 pm
by Blue Frost
He loves these attacks for his agenda of gun control, he believes whole heatedly in the Marxist thought of never letting a an opportunity slip where he can put down the other side.
Even if anyone with a brain knows it's his fault like this last attack was.

Re: Obama Is Coming For Your Guns

Posted: September 25th, 2016, 7:08 am
by Gary Oak
Forunately for this lady Obama hasn't been able to take her gun away or to get rid of the law that allows one to defend herself in her home.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... e-man.html

Obama Is Coming For Your Guns

Posted: September 25th, 2016, 7:17 am
by Blue Frost
I have the video posted in the guns thread, here it is :)

[video][/video]

Re: Obama Is Coming For Your Guns

Posted: June 14th, 2021, 3:11 pm
by Gary Oak
Obama’s boy Biden will apparently have trouble taking away the guns of the people of Missouri. I imagine that many people there believe what we believe are the actual motives behind taking away Americans guns. https://www.westernjournal.com/missouri ... ve-tribune

Re: Obama Is Coming For Your Guns

Posted: June 15th, 2021, 1:55 pm
by Blue Frost
I saw that one, and other states are doing some of the same.
I wish ours would, but we have a piece of crap liberal as governor.