Vaccines Safe Or Not ?

In search of truth, the mysterious, and bizarre. Gary rules here.
Forum rules
Civil discussion appreciated. No Spam...
User avatar

Topic author
Gary Oak
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7197
Joined: June 25th, 2012, 5:32 pm

Vaccines Safe Or Not ?

Post: # 158505Unread post Gary Oak »

No wonder Obama was pushing everybody taking shots. He didn't didn't care in the slightest how much harm he caused. Perhaps enjoyed ruining things for the people who voted for him.


User avatar

Blue Frost
SUPER VIP
SUPER VIP
Posts: 91473
Joined: May 14th, 2012, 1:01 am
Location: Yodenheim

Vaccines Safe Or Not ?

Post: # 158507Unread post Blue Frost »

It's all about control, nothing else.
Stunt the brain, population, and health so they can be masters over your whole life.
Of course I talk to myself. Sometimes I need expert advise, and a good conversation.
User avatar

Topic author
Gary Oak
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7197
Joined: June 25th, 2012, 5:32 pm

Vaccines Safe Or Not ?

Post: # 159858Unread post Gary Oak »

Alzheimer’s is something to be scared of. Once your memory goes it's all over. The chances I will ever will get a flu shot have decreased now from virtually nil.

Dr. Russell Blaylock Warns: Don’t Get the Flu Shot — It Promotes Alzheimer’s

The government is ratcheting up its efforts to convince Americans to get flu shots. “You can’t walk into a pharmacy without seeing lines, and the government is now telling preachers to tell their congregations to get flu shots,” says Dr. Russell Blaylock, renowned neurosurgeon and editor of the Blaylock Wellness Report. “I’ve never seen anything like it.

The incidence of flu across the United States is extremely low — there are virtually no outbreaks — and not a single child has died. Yet, the flu vaccine is being pushed as if it’s the greatest health advance ever discovered.

“The vaccine is completely worthless, and the government knows it,” says Dr. Blaylock. “There are three reasons the government tells the elderly why they should get flu shots: secondary pneumonia, hospitalization, and death. Yet a study by the Cochrane group studied hundreds of thousands of people and found it offered zero protection for those three things in the general community. It offered people in nursing homes some immunity against the flu — at best one-third — but that was only if they picked the right vaccine.”

The government also says that every baby over the age of six months should have a vaccine, and they know it contains a dose of mercury that is toxic to the brain. They also know the studies have shown that the flu vaccine has zero — zero — effectiveness in children under 5.

Here’s the bottom line: The vast number of people who get the flu vaccine aren’t going to get any benefit, but they get all of the risks and complications.

Flu vaccines contain mercury in the form of thimerosal (ethylmercury), a brain toxin, which accumulates in the brain and other organs. “It’s incorporated into the brain for a lifetime,” says Dr. Blaylock. “After five or 10 years of flu shots, enough mercury accumulates in the brain that every single study agrees is neurotoxic. Mercury is extremely toxic to the brain even in very small concentrations, and there are thousands of studies that prove it.”

The changes that we see in the brain associated with neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s are all easily produced by mercury in these doses.

Read the Full Article: Dr. Russell Blaylock Warns: Don’t Get the Flu Shot — It Promotes Alzheimer’s

See Also:

Coconut Oil and Alzheimer’s Disease: The News is Spreading



Virgin Coconut Oil and Alzheimer’s Disease

A Holistic Guide to Geriatric Care – eBook

Virgin Coconut Oil and Alzheimer’s Disease

In this book we look at the problems and causes of Alzheimer’s as they are related to an epidemic of prescription drugs being marketed to seniors, and we look at the strong evidence for dietary intervention, starting with coconut oil.

We bring you the stories of 10 different families who saw Alzheimer’s lessened or reversed by adding coconut oil to their diet, which is representative of thousands of others who are experiencing similar results. We offer guidelines on usage and types of coconut oil to consider, as well as other non-drug tips for holistic geriatric care.

Our target audience is the millions of caregivers out there loving caring for our senior population who will find it difficult to get this information from their doctors or medical professionals not trained in these areas.

https://healthimpactnews.com/2011/dr-ru ... lzheimers/
User avatar

Blue Frost
SUPER VIP
SUPER VIP
Posts: 91473
Joined: May 14th, 2012, 1:01 am
Location: Yodenheim

Vaccines Safe Or Not ?

Post: # 159885Unread post Blue Frost »

[video][/video]
Of course I talk to myself. Sometimes I need expert advise, and a good conversation.
User avatar

Azhya Aryola
'Member'
'Member'
Posts: 681
Joined: October 13th, 2012, 10:20 pm

Vaccines Safe Or Not ?

Post: # 159887Unread post Azhya Aryola »

I am not an authority on vaccines but I do get a flu shot and haven't had the flu since.
Azhya Aryola
_________________________________________________________
Sometimes, my comments have a touch of humor in it, often tongue-in-cheek, so don't take it so seriously.
User avatar

Blue Frost
SUPER VIP
SUPER VIP
Posts: 91473
Joined: May 14th, 2012, 1:01 am
Location: Yodenheim

Vaccines Safe Or Not ?

Post: # 159888Unread post Blue Frost »

I know people who has got the flu likely from the vaccines, and some who never have. You can have them ordered without the preservatives in them if you didn't know, it's a little safer.
Of course I talk to myself. Sometimes I need expert advise, and a good conversation.
User avatar

Topic author
Gary Oak
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7197
Joined: June 25th, 2012, 5:32 pm

Vaccines Safe Or Not ?

Post: # 159890Unread post Gary Oak »

I do believe that many doctors are afraid to speak up about it. I do know one PHD pharmacist who isn't afraid to speak up about things that are going on though.
User avatar

Blue Frost
SUPER VIP
SUPER VIP
Posts: 91473
Joined: May 14th, 2012, 1:01 am
Location: Yodenheim

Vaccines Safe Or Not ?

Post: # 159891Unread post Blue Frost »

For kids under 8 I don't think they should get them unless already compromised by other things such as an illness. As I keep saying the blood brain barrier isn't formed yet in them, the heavy mettle, and other non human chemicals is in the shots.
Of course I talk to myself. Sometimes I need expert advise, and a good conversation.
User avatar

Topic author
Gary Oak
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7197
Joined: June 25th, 2012, 5:32 pm

Vaccines Safe Or Not ?

Post: # 164630Unread post Gary Oak »

Perhaps doctors need to get danger pay especially if they are cancer specialists. In the short two minute video it loos almost like the cancer cells are a separate living organism trying to to defend themselves against the macrophages.

Doctors Who Discovered Cancer Enzymes In Vaccines All Found Murdered

Several holistic doctors have been found dead, in apparent suicides. The medical community is now speechless due to the timing of their deaths, based on the fact that they were all researchers working on a breakthrough cure for cancer.

Renowned autism specialist, Dr. James Jeffrey Bradstreet, was researching the enzyme prior to his death in July 2015. His body was discovered floating in a North Carolina river with a single gunshot wound to the chest.

Suspicions swirled that the doctor may have been killed as a result of his controversial research. Bradstreet and his colleagues had discovered that the immune system is being compromised by nagalase, which they suspected was being introduced through vaccines.

Dr. Bradstreet was working with a naturally occurring compound that may be the single most effective thing in the immune system for killing cancer cells

Nagalase interferes with an important protein in the body that kills cancer cells, explained Dr. Ted Broer in an interview on the Hagmann and Hagmann Report.

This new breakthrough cure, which you can learn more about in the video below, includes the human protein GcMAF (globulin component macrophage activating factor). GcMAF actually activates macrophages that are already existent inside of the human body, and in turn causes the body to destroy cancer cells.

As the body produces this substance naturally, many cancer patients cannot produce enough necessary to ward off the disease. Thankfully, when administered GcMAF, the immune system can become stronger and can fight cancer by itself, without more invasive treatments like radiation or chemotherapy. The GcMAF website says:

“Your GcMAF empowers your body to cure itself. In a healthy person, your own GcMAF has 11 actions discovered so far, including two on cells, three excellent effects on the brain, and 6 on cancer. Amongst these, it acts as a ‘director’ of your immune system.”

The video we have linked shows GcMAF in action by use of time-lapse photography over a period of 60 hours. It is no wonder that big pharma saw these doctors as their enemy, however, their lives were not payment for the monetary loss the pharmaceutical industry would have taken, and staying informed of information such as this is of the utmost importance.

http://awarenessact.com/doctors-who-dis ... dead/?=wuw
User avatar

Odinson
Super Member
Super Member
Posts: 4598
Joined: April 3rd, 2013, 1:50 pm

Vaccines Safe Or Not ?

Post: # 164631Unread post Odinson »

Unnecessary..
User avatar

Blue Frost
SUPER VIP
SUPER VIP
Posts: 91473
Joined: May 14th, 2012, 1:01 am
Location: Yodenheim

Vaccines Safe Or Not ?

Post: # 164802Unread post Blue Frost »

They spread the flu, and made it stronger doing it while poisoning people with the additives. Kids are hurt the most.

Last year’s flu vaccine was a total bust, yet the CDC claims it was a “grand success” – Here’s the truth of what happened
Posted on May 15, 2018 by Lance D Johnson
http://www.dcclothesline.com/2018/05/15 ... -happened/
(Natural News) The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) claims that last year’s flu vaccine was a “grand success.” Newly appointed CDC director Robert R. Redfield claimed the influenza A and B vaccines were 36 percent effective over 2017-2018 flu season. He tweeted praise on the vaccinatedbecause they “reduced risk of getting sick with the flu and having to go to the doctor by about one-third.”

Even though 36 percent effectiveness is scant and meaningless for a product that promises protection against serious disease, this number is NOT based on absolute risk reduction (ARR). Instead, the CDC bases its vaccine effectiveness numbers on something called relative risk reduction (RRR), a vague and misleading postulation that exaggerates the vaccine’s effectiveness. Their numbers are then echoed by the mainstream media to hide the real failure of the flu vaccine.

A more accurate figure for vaccine efficacy can be calculated by configuring the absolute risk reduction. This figure, which we will calculate below, is only about one percent. On top of misrepresenting the data, the CDC omits five other important factors that should be considered in determining vaccine effectiveness, including genetic mutations of flu viruses in vaccines, the shedding of flu viruses from vaccines, weakened humoral immunity after vaccination, the importance of the individual’s terrain in determining outcomes, and vaccine side effects, which can cause flu like illnesses, secondary infections, and neurological events. As we will explore, there is no reliable evidence linking flu vaccination to a flu reduction in the population. The shot actually causes harm to the vaccine recipient and is prone to shedding, increasing the likelihood that more people will become infected with mutated live virus strains.

Get more news like this without being censored: Get the Natural News app for your mobile devices. Enjoy uncensored news, lab test results, videos, podcasts and more. Bypass all the unfair censorship by Google, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter. Get your daily news and videos directly from the source! Download here.
Calculating absolute risk reduction instead of relative risk reduction

Former CDC director Tom Friedman claimed the vaccine was 60 percent effective last year, but what statistical analysis are these health authorities deriving their conclusions from? Let’s take a closer look: On the surface it sounds like sixty out of one hundred people will benefit from the flu vaccine. According to the current CDC director, it sounds like one in three people will be protected if they just get their yearly flu shot. These numbers, sadly low, are made more preposterous because they are based on the RRR statistical lie.

Here’s how the CDC comes up with the 60 percent effectiveness RRR statistical lie: When 100 unvaccinated people are exposed to the influenza virus, they found that five become ill. Therefore, 95 percent of the people did not get the flu, resulting in 5 percent incidence. If another 100 people got the flu shot and three came down with the flu, then 97 percent of the vaccinated group are declared protected by the vaccines, with a three percent incidence. Under the CDC’s RRR statistical rules, they divide three percent incidence by five percent incidence to get a relative effective rate of 60 percent.

If the CDC followed the more truthful ARR statistical rules, they would divide 95 percent by 97 percent to obtain a more accurate figure of roughly one percent. This means that one hundred people will have to be vaccinated in order for one person to benefit. Even this meager benefit of one percent is ultimately negated due to the fact that 100 percent of all vaccine recipients burden their body with toxins and mutated virus strains that weaken their humoral immune system and cause flu-like symptoms.
Selecting the virus strains for the vaccines is guesswork from the start

It takes at least six months for vaccine manufacturers to bring flu vaccines to market, in anticipation for another flu season. The experts select three or four influenza viruses from the southern hemisphere out of hundreds of different types and mutated subtypes that could circulate the following year in the northern hemisphere. This guesswork makes flu vaccines ineffective from the start.
Researchers find out that flu virus strains quickly mutate in chicken eggs

In order to obtain enough pathological material for widespread vaccine manufacture, scientists must grow the viruses in a medium; however, the viruses adapt to that environment and mutate into new forms. The virus’s genetics change. The viruses that are grown for vaccines are not always the same viruses that are circulating in the wild. This is why the vaccinated are unable to adapt to the pathogens that circulate year to year. The immune systems of the vaccinated are being trained to recognize and respond to viruses that are much different, thereby burdening the vaccinated person’s immune system, distracting immune-responsive cells, and taking away their ability to recognize and face the pathogens that are circulating among them naturally in real time.
READ MORE Man attending Route 91: ‘There is multiple active shooters here at the concert’

Scientists at The Scripps Research Institute (TSRI) found that the practice of growing influenza vaccine components in chicken eggs disrupts the major antibody target site on the virus surface, rendering the flu vaccine less effective in humans. The influenza subtype used in their study, H3N2, quickly mutated when grown in the chicken eggs. By the time the vaccine was put in the marketplace, the viruses people are inundated with do not resemble what they will have to face in real time. Flu vaccines are actually equipping flu viruses with new traits for survival, making flu viruses more diverse, with stronger mutations that can hinder the elderly, the young, and the immunocompromised. This is why many vaccinated individuals tend to get sick three or more times a year. First they may come down with symptoms from the mutated strains, and then they may become ill with the side effects of the vaccine toxins. As their bodies become immunocompromised, they are more susceptible to secondary respiratory infections such as bronchitis and harsh colds. By the time they have recovered, their bodies aren’t prepared to face the actual flu viruses that are circulating in the wild.
Vaccine effectiveness rate does not incorporate any measurement of an individual’s cellular terrain for its potential for harboring or detracting disease

The effectiveness rate of the vaccine is a lie from the start because it only focuses on infection of the germ and not on the status of an individual’s cellular terrain, which can either harbor disease or detract it. In their quests for survival and replication, viruses encounter different cellular and microbial terrains within people. These terrains are formed through dietary choices and are affected by environmental toxins. These terrains vary from person to person, depending on what nutrients they are absorbing and the abundance of healthy microbes that are present inside and outside their bodies.

Viruses encounter different terrains per individual. For example, a flu subtype may cross paths with someone who is chronically deficient in vitamin C, D, magnesium and zinc. The person’s cellular terrain may be functioning at a minimum, their microbiome not processing nutrients due to exposure to antibiotics and antacid drugs. Their weak internal terrain or damaged mucosal membranes may readily harbor disease; whereas, someone who is actively absorbing nutrients may easily repel the same virus material.

Individuals who want to have better outcomes in the face of germs should focus less on the anxiety and fear of infection, and be more focused on empowering the internal terrain of their microbiome and cellular energy production. This strengthening of the terrain is made possible through the absorption of nutritive compounds that benefit immune response, including the utilization of the sun’s energy for vitamin D production. This strengthening is made possible through absorption of the antioxidants and minerals found in plants, the utilization of healthy fats for creating strong cell membranes, and the strengthening and diversifying of healthy microbes in the gut for efficient use of nutrients, blood protection, and stress management. If the CDC wants to prevent flu in the population, they should interview the unvaccinated who rarely get sick and see what they are doing to establish a healthy terrain. (Related: Flu vaccine virtually worthless in people 65 and older: Here’s what you can do instead.)
READ MORE These 5 Organizations are the Reason Cannabis is Still a Crime
The reality of virus shedding from attenuated live virus vaccines

If you are afraid of getting the flu and think a vaccine is the best way to protect yourself and those who are immunocompromised – think again. After you are injected with a live attenuated virus, you are 6.3 times more likely to spread the flu virus through the air than your unvaccinated counterparts. A groundbreaking study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) debunks herd immunity and actually shows that the vaccinated herd members are the ones perpetuating the disease they were vaccinated for. You may think the unvaccinated are putting the vulnerable at risk, but they aren’t infected by default. They aren’t the ones knowingly becoming 630 percent more likely to spread the flu to the immunocompromised. Live virus shedding after vaccination can occur for several weeks. Those who are vaccinated with live virus vaccines should be quarantined from the young and elderly because they are highly infectious when compared to the unvaccinated who are not carriers of disease by default.
Do flu vaccines cause higher incidence of other infections?

The CDC’s vaccine effectiveness propaganda does not include any mention of secondary respiratory infection, such as severe colds and bronchitis, which are prevalent in the vaccinated. These health issues can cause visits to the doctor just the same. The flu vaccine gives people a false sense of safety, making the vaccinated less likely to take other preventative steps, such as fortifying their body with the right nutrients for a stronger cellular terrain. This would make the vaccinated, in general, more susceptible to secondary infections.

The vaccinated should not just trust in the vaccine to take care of their yearly immunity. As their immune system is burdened with mutated influenza viruses from the vaccine, it is not prepared to handle the viruses that are actually circulating in the wild. Those who choose not to vaccinate are not burdened by mutated pathogens and are more likely to be diligent in fortifying their bodies with the nutrients that strengthen their natural immune response. In this way, the unvaccinated will be more adapted to handle the viruses that they encounter naturally.
Side effects of vaccines burden vaccine recipients, weakening humoral immunity

Because the flu vaccine contains mercury, formaldehyde, squalene, Polysorbate 80, and the kidney cells of dogs, the total formula can cause health issues within the body, depending on one’s current health situation. How a person reacts to a vaccine depends on pre-existing conditions such as the state of their microbiome, the health of their kidneys, liver, and lymph, their previous exposure to vaccine toxins and environmental toxins, and the blood to weight volume of the individual being vaccinated. In trying to protect against the flu, the vaccine can simultaneously cause blood and lymphatic disorders, gastrointestinal distress, nervous system disorders, psychiatric events, metabolism issues, eye disorders, influenza-type illnesses. Some bodies reject the toxins in the vaccine quickly, leading to swelling and mood changes. Some toxins cross the blood-brain barrier, leading to encephalitis (brain swelling), encephalopathy (brain damage), and Guillain-Barre Syndrome, three of the more serious neurological events reported after vaccine use.
READ MORE Finnish court okays Muslim’s rape of a 10-year-old girl as part of his “culture”
Vaccine efficacy never truly established before vaccines are licensed

Vaccine efficacy is never truly established before a vaccine comes to market. Vaccine efficacy in human populations is not rooted in clinical studies measuring its true effectiveness in the field. Vaccines are often approved based on animal studies that show that the vaccine induces an immunological response. A vaccine can be licensed based on the assumption that the animal’s immune response will be replicated in the human body through similar pathways. Even worse, vaccines can be licensed without even this correlation. According to the FDA’s “animal rule” the animal efficacy data of the vaccine may establish that there is a reasonable likelihood that the product would produce clinical benefit in humans, with or without any correlation at all. This means that some vaccines are approved without any scientific conclusion, just an untested hypothesis. This means that vaccines are highly experimental, not based on any short or long term outcomes observed in human participants in clinical settings. All effectiveness rates for vaccines are mere projections and postulations, not grounded in real data. No one knows how long a vaccine’s so-called immunity really lasts or if the same immune response observed in animals actually carries over to humans. To make matters worse, the immune response used to license vaccines is based on serology studies. This means that vaccine efficacy is determined by identifying and measuring antibodies in body fluids. This is why adjuvants such as aluminum salts or squalene are added to vaccines, to inflame the injection site and enhance the immune response, to make the vaccine appear more clinically effective. However, the measurement of an immune response in serum is not the same as the true measurement of long term, learned immunity to pathogens of various subtypes and serotypes in the individual.
Did last year’s flu vaccine cause more hospitalizations than it prevented?

The handful of viruses chosen for each year’s flu vaccine is guesswork because there are up to 200 different subtypes of the flu virus that can cause illness and these strains are constantly mutating. After these guesswork viruses mutate in the chicken embryo medium, they do not resemble the actual flu viruses that will circulate among the population. Therefore, getting a flu vaccine is virtually 100 percent useless, with a degree of harm imposed on the vaccine recipient. Nevertheless, in the vaccinated, there is potential for further harm, including the weakening of the individual immune system which becomes mal-adapted to fight future infections. Also, with the vaccinated, the potential for infections to spread are greater, especially in those who are exposed to the aerosolized live virus shedding which comes from the very breath of those vaccinated with live virus strains.

It’s a shame that health care institutions require a defective and harmful product to be mandated on their workers. It’s morally disturbing that this product is marketed to pregnant women and babies.

For more truthful analysis of the flu and other vaccines, visit Vaccines.News.
Of course I talk to myself. Sometimes I need expert advise, and a good conversation.
User avatar

Gary Oaktree

Vaccines Safe Or Not ?

Post: # 164810Unread post Gary Oaktree »

The flu shot has always seemed so suspicious to me as to me a flu is no big deal, it’s just something that happens from time to time. Injections is an effective way to put things into the masses bodies that otherwise they couldn’t. Obama getting on live television to encourage people to get the flu shot tells me that it cannot be good for us.
User avatar

Blue Frost
SUPER VIP
SUPER VIP
Posts: 91473
Joined: May 14th, 2012, 1:01 am
Location: Yodenheim

Vaccines Safe Or Not ?

Post: # 164817Unread post Blue Frost »

They spread the virus, they are lying if they say it don't.
Proof is when you get the shot you are told you will get a mild case of the flu, at least some tell you that.
Of course I talk to myself. Sometimes I need expert advise, and a good conversation.
User avatar

Reverse Flash
The Phenomenal One
The Phenomenal One
Posts: 8113
Joined: May 15th, 2012, 12:08 am
Contact:

Vaccines Safe Or Not ?

Post: # 164843Unread post Reverse Flash »

I am never getting any so called vaccine shots. In elementry and high school we were forced to take that shit.
The timeline is malleable
User avatar

Blue Frost
SUPER VIP
SUPER VIP
Posts: 91473
Joined: May 14th, 2012, 1:01 am
Location: Yodenheim

Vaccines Safe Or Not ?

Post: # 164846Unread post Blue Frost »

Same here, but there wasn't so many like today being forced on the public unnecessarily.
Kids under 7 or 8 they really should not be vaccinated as much, the stuff getting into their brains are toxic with lifetime affects.
Of course I talk to myself. Sometimes I need expert advise, and a good conversation.
User avatar

Topic author
Gary Oak
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7197
Joined: June 25th, 2012, 5:32 pm

Vaccines Safe Or Not ?

Post: # 169740Unread post Gary Oak »

Injection is a way to get something harmful into peoples bodies. Watch the video and decide for yourself.


Las Vegas man blames flu shot for triggering rare disorder

LAS VEGAS (KSNV) — A Las Vegas man became partially paralyzed, lost his vision and the ability to walk just one day after receiving the flu shot.

He's been hospitalized for the last 2 weeks. At one point he was even put on a ventilator and in the ICU and his family blames the flu shot.

Shane Morgan went from perfectly healthy to unable to speak, walk, or breathe on his own.


https://news3lv.com/news/local/las-vega ... e-disorder
User avatar

Blue Frost
SUPER VIP
SUPER VIP
Posts: 91473
Joined: May 14th, 2012, 1:01 am
Location: Yodenheim

Vaccines Safe Or Not ?

Post: # 169868Unread post Blue Frost »

I'm not sure, but some vaccine causes shingles in my view, you never seen that stuff when I was growing up till the late 90s came around.
They say it's from having chicken pox, but your immunity is suppose to cover that after having them.
Isn't it logical to assume something isn't right here ?
Of course I talk to myself. Sometimes I need expert advise, and a good conversation.
User avatar

Gary Oaktree

Vaccines Safe Or Not ?

Post: # 169953Unread post Gary Oaktree »

As I have mentioned a few times, I know a PhD pharmacist who naturally knows some things that we don’t and he says that they are putting harmful things in the shots.
User avatar

Blue Frost
SUPER VIP
SUPER VIP
Posts: 91473
Joined: May 14th, 2012, 1:01 am
Location: Yodenheim

Vaccines Safe Or Not ?

Post: # 169971Unread post Blue Frost »

Like DNA from other animals corrupting cells, and chemicals that hard kids most of all because the blood brain barrier isn't formed yet.
Also out immune system needs to fight, or we become weak.
Of course I talk to myself. Sometimes I need expert advise, and a good conversation.
User avatar

Berry Sweet
Special Member
Special Member
Posts: 406
Joined: December 30th, 2016, 10:43 pm

Vaccines Safe Or Not ?

Post: # 170042Unread post Berry Sweet »

Vaccines are a hard debate. I've read a lot of conspiracy stories and such. Lots of fear mongering.

I had all my vaccines in life, my kid has had all of her vaccines, theres never been a problem.

I do however believe a small percentage of people have a bad reaction to the vaccines, their bodies just dont take...in cases as such, the government should take care of these people and health care costs.

My kid and I never get the flu shots. Last time I had the flu, I was 7 years old...I think I may have built some immunity there? I've also never had the chicken pox, even tho I was made to play with kids who had it, never got it. The kid has never had the flu either, shes had mild colds but never the flu.

I know families with lots of kids who get the flu shot and it's just a tag team cycle all winter of the family getting sick...its not from the actual flu, but bought on by the shot itself.

My question is, the strain changes every year...so how can they know what the strain is in developing the shot? And are people really getting sick from the actual flu? Or are they getting sick and spreading sickness from the shot? I only ask cause like I said, I never get the flu, as my kid either...so I really question it.

Quick Reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
   
Post Reply