Most babies born nowadays seem to have the ugly gene.

Register accountRead the forum rules
Post Reply
osamablogger

Most babies born nowadays seem to have the ugly gene.

Unread post by osamablogger »

Is it polution or what?


Itsy Bitsy
Posts: 2441
Joined: 04 Nov 2010, 10:06

Re: Most babies born nowadays seem to have the ugly gene.

Unread post by Itsy Bitsy »

I disagree. When I look at pictures of people in earlier times, I often can't help but notice how fucking ugly they are.... like products of incest. Their faces are asymmetrical with disproportionate features and they aged sooooo fast. They also all looked more or less the same.

Nowadays there is a lot more ethnic mixing. Even if it's just multiple nationalities on the same continent (ie. german/french or chinese/vietnamese) it seems to have evened out the blatently retarded looks people had hundreds of years ago. Even better looking though are cross continent mixes that further balance out extreme and harsh facial features and create a more moderate look.


User avatar
Lochdubh
Posts: 54183
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 11:19

Re: Most babies born nowadays seem to have the ugly gene.

Unread post by Lochdubh »

Henry's baby has the cute gene. :)


me
Posts: 27110
Joined: 14 Aug 2009, 16:22

Re: Most babies born nowadays seem to have the ugly gene.

Unread post by me »

Lochdubh wrote:Henry's baby has the cute gene. :)
Big time. =)


Azhya Aryola
Posts: 17268
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 09:45
Location: Eastern Seaboard

Re: Most babies born nowadays seem to have the ugly gene.

Unread post by Azhya Aryola »

This is an ugly baby.

Image


Azhya Aryola

Sometimes, my comments have a touch of humor, often tongue-in-cheek, so don't take it so seriously.
J0E
Posts: 36778
Joined: 11 May 2010, 17:41

Re: Most babies born nowadays seem to have the ugly gene.

Unread post by J0E »

Lochdubh wrote:Henry's baby has the cute gene. :)
really, eh Lochdubh? Since when have you ordained yourself a judge of 'baby-licious' looks?

Have you ever managed a baby pageant b'fore? Hmm?

I'm waitin' to see a list of your C.V. accomplishments here. ;)


User avatar
anon
Posts: 11905
Joined: 20 Aug 2009, 10:46

Re: Most babies born nowadays seem to have the ugly gene.

Unread post by anon »

me wrote:
Lochdubh wrote:Henry's baby has the cute gene. :)
Big time. =)
You're both right :)


Excelsior!
User avatar
Lochdubh
Posts: 54183
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 11:19

Re: Most babies born nowadays seem to have the ugly gene.

Unread post by Lochdubh »

Jo wrote:
Lochdubh wrote:Henry's baby has the cute gene. :)
really, eh Lochdubh? Since when have you ordained yourself a judge of 'baby-licious' looks?

Have you ever managed a baby pageant b'fore? Hmm?

I'm waitin' to see a list of your C.V. accomplishments here. ;)
I'm reminded of the American jurist who when challenged to define "pornography" could not, then, on the rebound said, ".......but I know it when I see it." Cute is exactly like that. :)


User avatar
Renee
Posts: 5233
Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 07:44

Re: Most babies born nowadays seem to have the ugly gene.

Unread post by Renee »

Itsy Bitsy wrote:I disagree. When I look at pictures of people in earlier times, I often can't help but notice how fucking ugly they are.... like products of incest. Their faces are asymmetrical with disproportionate features and they aged sooooo fast. They also all looked more or less the same.

Nowadays there is a lot more ethnic mixing. Even if it's just multiple nationalities on the same continent (ie. german/french or chinese/vietnamese) it seems to have evened out the blatently retarded looks people had hundreds of years ago. Even better looking though are cross continent mixes that further balance out extreme and harsh facial features and create a more moderate look.
I don’t think it has anything to do with ethnic mixing and everything to do with proper nutrition and medical care.

I agree you do see an awful lot of homely people in old pictures, especially from the 19th and early 20th centuries. But you have to remember that people didn’t have their physical deficiencies fixed back then. There simply wasn’t the medical technology to do it and improper nutrition led to all kinds of minor and major physical irregularities that affected people’s physical appearance. Furthermore the lives people led where much harder than they are today and people grew old before their time and looked old before their time as well. Also diseases that we rarely see today were common and they affected people in how they looked as well. Afflictions such as rickets left people physically deformed and deseases such as small pox left scares that today can be remedied but back then you were stuck with it.


They call me the Poisonous Hate Blob.
Itsy Bitsy
Posts: 2441
Joined: 04 Nov 2010, 10:06

Re: Most babies born nowadays seem to have the ugly gene.

Unread post by Itsy Bitsy »

^ I always thought it was more of an incest like occurance. Not enough variety in the gene pool to weed out undesirable traits.

I'm sure you're correct, for the most part, but even the healthier looking people (ie. teenaged royalty) in older photos seem to have traits that I don't find desirable.


Brutus
Posts: 10255
Joined: 22 Oct 2009, 04:59

Re: Most babies born nowadays seem to have the ugly gene.

Unread post by Brutus »

Itsy Bitsy wrote:I disagree. When I look at pictures of people in earlier times, I often can't help but notice how fucking ugly they are.... like products of incest. Their faces are asymmetrical with disproportionate features and they aged sooooo fast. They also all looked more or less the same.
You just described SMP... :D


All I want for Christmas is a Mistletoe belt buckle.
User avatar
Renee
Posts: 5233
Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 07:44

Re: Most babies born nowadays seem to have the ugly gene.

Unread post by Renee »

Itsy Bitsy wrote:^ I always thought it was more of an incest like occurance. Not enough variety in the gene pool to weed out undesirable traits.

I'm sure you're correct, for the most part, but even the healthier looking people (ie. teenaged royalty) in older photos seem to have traits that I don't find desirable.
Royalty, even with their privilege and money were still at the mercy of the medical technology of the times and even to some extent the nutritional factors. Even as recent as the early 20th century if you were born with a cleft pallet, crossed eyes, large birth marks a misshapen head or what have you; you were stuck with it for life. It didn’t matter how much money you had the medical technology to fix birth defects just wasn’t there. That’s why you see so many people in old pictures that have eyes that look in different directions, huge noses, no teeth, and odd shaped heads and so on. Man by design is an ugly creature because he is a biologically complex creature and the more complex the organism the more there is to go wrong if the right conditions are not present.


They call me the Poisonous Hate Blob.
osamablogger

Re: Most babies born nowadays seem to have the ugly gene.

Unread post by osamablogger »

That is common sense.


Brutus
Posts: 10255
Joined: 22 Oct 2009, 04:59

Re: Most babies born nowadays seem to have the ugly gene.

Unread post by Brutus »

Chaz Bono wrote:That is common sense.
What do you know about common sense? Shut up freak!


All I want for Christmas is a Mistletoe belt buckle.
User avatar
9 incher/160 IQ
Posts: 17706
Joined: 19 Nov 2015, 18:57

Re: Most babies born nowadays seem to have the ugly gene.

Unread post by 9 incher/160 IQ »

Itsy Bitsy wrote: 26 May 2011, 09:47 I disagree. When I look at pictures of people in earlier times, I often can't help but notice how fucking ugly they are.... like products of incest. Their faces are asymmetrical with disproportionate features and they aged sooooo fast. They also all looked more or less the same.

Nowadays there is a lot more ethnic mixing. Even if it's just multiple nationalities on the same continent (ie. german/french or chinese/vietnamese) it seems to have evened out the blatently retarded looks people had hundreds of years ago. Even better looking though are cross continent mixes that further balance out extreme and harsh facial features and create a more moderate look.
Scouse likes ethnic mixing to improve the white race.


Fuc# 0ff.
User avatar
9 incher/160 IQ
Posts: 17706
Joined: 19 Nov 2015, 18:57

Re: Most babies born nowadays seem to have the ugly gene.

Unread post by 9 incher/160 IQ »

osamablogger wrote: 26 May 2011, 09:33 Is it polution or what?
Pollution.


Fuc# 0ff.
User avatar
SCOUSE
Posts: 19278
Joined: 21 Jun 2015, 12:05

Re: Most babies born nowadays seem to have the ugly gene.

Unread post by SCOUSE »

Brutus wrote: 26 May 2011, 14:34
Itsy Bitsy wrote:I disagree. When I look at pictures of people in earlier times, I often can't help but notice how fucking ugly they are.... like products of incest. Their faces are asymmetrical with disproportionate features and they aged sooooo fast. They also all looked more or less the same.
You just described SMP... :D
Ed, are you ugly? :scared:


Hugo Boss wrote: 29 Jan 2021, 17:36 The Blurt cries out in pain as he strikes you!
Post Reply